Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Matthew Dellavedova vs Ognjen Milic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Dellavedova vs Milic analysis and find out who is favored!
Matthew Dellavedova vs Ognjen Milic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Dellavedova 1 - 0 Milic
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Dellavedova has won 51.24% of points on their second serve, while Milic has won 41.84%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Dellavedova, in recent form, has won 53.41% of their opponent's second serve points, while Milic has won 37.88%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.24% and 29.33% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Dellavedova has saved 59.58% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Milic has saved 40% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Dellavedova has won 57.89% of matches played (W/L 55/ 40), with Milic winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Dellavedova has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 131/ 106), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 14% (W/L 1/ 6). Milic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Dellavedova has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.29% of matches (W/L 45/ 25), where as Milic has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 25% of matches (W/L 1/ 3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Dellavedova winning 1 times and Milic being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Dellavedova winning 2 and Milic winning 0. The last match between Dellavedova and Milic was at the M15 Kursumlijska Banja, 15-05-2024, First, Clay with Matthew Dellavedova getting the victory 6-1 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:6:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Dellavedova and Milic have played a deciding set 0 times, with Dellavedova winning 0 times and Milic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Dellavedova winning 0, and Milic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Dellavedova has played against opponents with an average rank of 200.68 while Milic has played against players with an average rank of 345.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Dellavedova has won 64% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Milic has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Dellavedova has converted 41.92% of breakpoint opportunities, and Milic has converted 83.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
429
Rank
427
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
16
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
Form
L
L
W
L
53% (245-216)
Career Total W/L
25% (1-3)
49% (17-18)
YTD W/L
33% (1-2)
$3,550
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Dellavedova VS Milic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Matthew Dellavedova | Ognjen Milic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 1 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:6:0 | 1:6:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (20/28) | 33% (15/46) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 85% (17/20) | 60% (9/15) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 88% (7/8) | 26% (8/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (6/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 63% (29/46) | 14% (4/28) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Dellavedova VS Milic H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-0 |
Stats 
Matthew Dellavedova
Player
Ognjen Milic
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve %
33%
(
15 of
46)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
53
Total Points Won
21
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Matthew Dellavedova | Ognjen Milic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 49% (17/18) | 33% (1/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 46% (36/42) | 33% (2/4) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (330/346) | 42% (22/30) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (5/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (12/8) | 33% (1/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.1 | 0.12 |
| Aces Total | 32 | 3 |
| DFs per game | 0.16 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 52 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:9 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 239.8 | 288.33 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (1617/2271) | 39% (62/160) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (995/1617) | 77% (48/62) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (324/654) | 42% (41/98) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (92/225) | 83% (5/6) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (837/2092) | 33% (47/141) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (4/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 57% (12/9) | 33% (1/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 49% (17/35) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 75% (6/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 94% (17/16) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 6% (17/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 6% (18/1) | 0% (2/0) |
Matthew Dellavedova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Dellavedova
Player
Felix Mischker
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve %
58%
(
21 of
36)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
52
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maks Kasnikowski
Player
Matthew Dellavedova
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matthew Dellavedova
Player
Sergey Fomin
73%
(
66 of
90)
1st Serve %
82%
(
62 of
76)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
45 of
62)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
31 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
76)
86
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Dellavedova
Player
Sasa Markovic
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(10) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Edas Butvilas
Player
Matthew Dellavedova
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve %
78%
(
39 of
50)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Matthew Dellavedova
Player
Antoine Ghibaudo
66%
(
71 of
108)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
94)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
46%
(
50 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
94)
101
Total Points Won
101
|
2-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matthew Dellavedova
Player
Gabriel Donev
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
69
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matthew Dellavedova
Player
Lazar Vojinovic
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
83%
(
29 of
35)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Dellavedova
Player
Ognjen Milic
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve %
33%
(
15 of
46)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
53
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Damien Wenger
Player
Matthew Dellavedova
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
79%
(
55 of
70)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Ognjen Milic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Diego Barreto Sanchez
Player
Ognjen Milic
49%
(
34 of
70)
1st Serve %
33%
(
20 of
61)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
16 of
20)
69%
(
25 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ognjen Milic
Player
Vuk Radjenovic
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve %
49%
(
21 of
43)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Dellavedova
Player
Ognjen Milic
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve %
33%
(
15 of
46)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
53
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Ognjen Milic
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Dellavedova Vs Milic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Matthew Dellavedova
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
